Data Apps
EcoImagesEcoPlots
Tools
CoESRA Virtual DesktopData Discovery PortalLandscape Data VisualiserSHaRED Data SubmissionTERN Linked Data ResourcesTERN Account
Resources
Terms Of UseDisclaimerCopyrightData LicensingHelp & Support
logo
Data

Data Discovery

  • Home
  • Search
  • Resources
    LTES SurveyResearch Infrastructure
    TDDP User ManualTDDP API
METADATA

Seasonal fractional cover - Landsat, JRSRP algorithm Version 3.0, Australia coverage

Viewed: 0
Accessed: 0

Description

The seasonal fractional cover product shows representative values for the proportion of bare, green and non-green cover across a season. It is a spatially explicit raster product, which predicts vegetation cover at medium resolution (30 m per-pixel) for each 3-month calendar season. The green and non-green fractions may include a mix of woody and non-woody vegetation. A 3 band (byte) image is produced: band 1 – bare ground fraction (in percent), band 2 - green vegetation fraction (in percent), band 3 – non-green vegetation fraction (in percent). The no data value is 255.
Credit
We at TERN acknowledge the Traditional Owners and Custodians throughout Australia, New Zealand and all nations. We honour their profound connections to land, water, biodiversity and culture and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging.
This dataset was produced by the Joint Remote Sensing Research Program using data sourced from US Geological Survey.
Purpose
This product captures variability in fractional cover at seasonal (i.e. three-monthly) time scales, forming a consistent time series from 1987 - present. It is useful for investigating inter-annual changes in vegetation cover and analysing regional comparisons. For applications that focus on non-woody vegetation, the ground cover product, derived from fractional cover, may be more suitable. For applications investigating rapid change during a season, monthly composite or single-date (available on request) fractional cover products may be more appropriate. This product is based upon the JRSRP Fractional Cover 3.0 algorithm.
Supplemental Information
A 3 band (byte) image is produced: band 1 – bare ground fraction (bare ground, rock, disturbed) in percent, band 2 - green vegetation fraction in percent, band 3 – non-green vegetation fraction (litter, dead leaf and branches) in percent. The no data value is 255.

Lineage

Summary of processing: Landsat surface reflectance data > multiple single-date fractional cover datasets > medoid calculation for seasonal composite of fractional cover
Further details are provided in the Methods section.

Data Creation
Image Pre-Processing: All input Landsat TM/ETM+/OLI imagery was downloaded from the USGS EarthExplorer website as level L1T imagery. Images which the EarthExplorer site rated as having greater than 80% cloud cover were not downloaded. The imagery has been corrected for atmospheric effects, and bi-directional reflectance and topographic effects, using the methods detailed by Flood et al (2013). The result is surface reflectance standardised to a fixed viewing and illumination geometry. Cloud, cloud shadow and snow have been masked out using the Fmask automatic cloud mask algorithm. Topographic shadowing has been masked using the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission DEM at 30 m resolution. Water has been masked out using the methods outlines in Danaher & Collett (2006).
Fractional Cover Model (Version 3.0): A multilayer perceptron (MLP) model is used to estimate percentage cover in three fractions – bare ground, photosynthetic vegetation (PV) and non-photosynthetic vegetation (NPV) from surface reflectance, for every image captured within the season. The MLP model was trained with Tensorflow using Landsat TM, ETM+ and OLI surface reflectance and a collection of approximately 4000 field observations of overstorey and ground cover. The field observations covered a wide variety of vegetation, soil and climate types across Australia, and were collected between 1997 and 2018 following the procedure outlined in Muir et al (2011). The model was assessed to predict the vegetation cover fractions with MAE/wMAPE/RMSE of: bare - 6.9%/34.9%/14.5% PV - 4.6%/37.9%/10.6% NPV - 9.8%/25.2%/16.9%.
Seasonal Compositing: The method of compositing used selection of representative pixels through the determination of the medoid (multi-dimensional equivalent of the median) of three months (a season) of fractional cover imagery. The medoid is the point which minimises the total distance between the selected point and all other points. Thus the selected point is “in the middle” of the set of points. The value selected is a specific data point and not an averaged or blended value. It is robust against extreme values, inherently avoiding the selection of outliers, such as occurs when cloud or cloud shadow goes undetected. At least three pixels from the time-series of imagery for the season must be available. Unfortunately, due to the high level of cloud cover in some areas, often three cloud free pixels are not available, resulting in data gaps in the seasonal fractional cover image. For further details on this method see Flood (2013).

Temporal coverage

From 12/1/1987

Dates

Date modified

7/14/2014

Citation information

How to cite this collection:

Joint Remote Sensing Research Program (2022): Seasonal fractional cover - Landsat, JRSRP algorithm Version 3.0, Australia coverage. Version 1.0. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. (Dataset). https://portal.tern.org.au/metadata/23880

Access data

This data can be accessed from the following websites
  • Differences between Fractional Cover version 2 and version 3
  • Seasonal Fractional Cover via HTTP
  • Vegmachine Timeseries Viewer
  • GitLab Code for Fractional Cover version 3

Access metadata

Point-of-truth metadata URL

Rights and Licensing

CC-BY

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

TERN services are provided on an “as-is” and “as available” basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure.
Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN.

Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting

It is not recommended that these data sets be used at scales more detailed than 1:100,000.

Spatial coverage

Keywords

Parameters
  • bare soil fraction (Percent)
  • photosynthetic vegetation fraction (Percent)
  • non-photosynthetic vegetation fraction (Percent)
Platforms
  • LANDSAT-5
  • LANDSAT-7
  • LANDSAT-8
  • LANDSAT-9
Instruments
  • TM
  • ETM+
  • OLI
Data Resolution
  • 30 meters - < 100 meters
  • Weekly - < Monthly
GCMD Science
  • LAND USE/LAND COVER
  • VEGETATION COVER
  • SOILS
ANZSRC - FOR
  • Environmental management
  • Environmental assessment and monitoring
  • Ecological applications
Topic Categories
  • Environment
  • Imagery Base Maps Earth Cover

Additional information

AuthorsAuthors
  • Joint Remote Sensing Research Program
Point of ContactPoint of Contact
  • Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
  • van den Berg, Deanna
PublisherPublisher
  • Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Distributor's OrganisationDistributor's Organisation
  • Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
PublicationsPublications
  • Flood, N., Danaher, T., Gill, T. and Gillingham, S. (2013) An Operational Scheme for Deriving Standardised Surface Reflectance from Landsat TM/ETM+ and SPOT HRG Imagery for Eastern Australia. Remote Sens. 2013, 5(1), 83-109. doi:10.3390/rs5010083
  • Zhu, Z. and Woodcock, C.E. (2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery Remote Sensing of Environment 118. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028
  • Muir, J. et al (2011), Field measurement of fractional ground cover: supporting ground cover monitoring for Australia. ABARES. Canberra
  • Flood, N. (2013) Seasonal Composite Landsat TM/ETM+ Images Using the Medoid (a Multi-dimensional Median). Remote Sens. 2013, 5(12), 6481-6500
Data QualityData Quality
  • Data Quality Assessment Scope:
    1) The input imagery was processed to level L1T by the USGS. Geodetic accuracy of the product depends on the image quality and the accuracy, number, and distribution of the ground control points. 2) The fractional cover model was compared to samples drawn from approximately 4000 field reference sites.
  • Data Quality Assessment Result:
    1) The USGS aims to provide image-to-image registration with an accuracy of 12 m. Refer to the L8 Data Users Handbook for more detail. 2) The fractional cover model predicts the vegetation cover fractions with MAE/wMAPE/RMSE of: bare - 6.9%/34.9%/14.5% PV - 4.6%/37.9%/10.6% NPV - 9.8%/25.2%/16.9%.

Related datasets

with matching subjects

Access data
  • Differences between Fractional Cover version 2 and version 3
  • Seasonal Fractional Cover via HTTP
  • Vegmachine Timeseries Viewer
  • GitLab Code for Fractional Cover version 3
Contacts
  • Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
  • Building 1019, 80 Meiers Rd
  • QLD 4068
  • Australia

Contact us

Physical & Mail Address
The University of Queensland
Long Pocket Precinct
Level 5, Foxtail Building #1019
80 Meiers Road
Indooroopilly QLD 4068 Australia

P (07) 3365 9097
E esupport@tern.org.au

Subscribe for project updates, data releases, research findings, and users stories direct to your inbox.

Funding

TERN is supported by the Australian Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy, NCRIS.

Co-investment

Resources

Terms Of Use

Disclaimer

Copyright

Data Licensing

Help & Support

Key Operating Partners
Version:1.0.1