Data Apps
EcoImagesEcoPlots
Tools
CoESRA Virtual DesktopData DiscoveryLandscape Data VisualiserSHaRED Data SubmissionTERN Linked Data ResourcesTERN Account
Resources
Terms Of UseDisclaimerCopyrightData LicensingHelp & Support
logo
Data

Data Discovery

  • Home
  • Search
  • Resources
    LTES SurveyResearch Infrastructure
    TDDP User ManualTDDP API

Recovery of woody, not herbaceous native flora ten years post old-field restoration 

Ver: 1.0
Status of Data: completed
Update Frequency: notPlanned
Security Classification: unclassified
Record Last Modified: 2025-12-02
Viewed 71 times
Accessed 5 times
Dataset Created: 2021-08-10
Dataset Published: 2021-08-17
Data can be accessed from the following links:
HTTPPoint-of-truth metadata URLHTTPFloraSpeciesAbundanceData_DUJPVqe.csvHTTPFloristicsCoverData_d4CMsyg.csvHTTPFloristicsSpeciesRichnessData.csvHTTPdata_dictionaryCover.csvHTTPdata_dictionaryRichness.csvHTTPro-crate-metadata.json
How to cite this collection:
Parkhurst, T. (2021). Recovery of woody, not herbaceous native flora ten years post old-field restoration. Version 1.0. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. https://dx.doi.org/10.25901/c050-ca34 
We selected nine study sites, each incorporating three vegetation states: (a) fallow cropland, representing the restoration starting point, (b) planted old field (actively restored site), and (c) reference York gum (E. loxophleba) woodland. Plant species richness and cover All annual and perennial plant species were recorded in spring 2017 within each plot and identified to genus and species level where possible. Nomenclatures follow the Western Australian Herbarium (2017). A point intercept method previously demonstrated to provide objective and repeatable measures of cover (Godínez-Alvarez, Herrick, Mattocks, Toledo & Van Zee 2009; Prober, Standish & Wiehl 2011) was used to quantify cover of individual plant species, total vegetation cover and substrate types (i.e., bare ground, litter cover, plant cover). Ground cover, individual species, and canopy cover intercepting at every 2 m along four parallel, evenly spaced 50 m transects across each plot were recorded using a vertically placed dowel (8 mm wide, 2 m tall), resulting in 100 intercepting points per plot. For planted old fields, transects were placed parallel to planting rows, with two centred on rows and two centred between rows. This approximately represented the relative abundance of planted rows and non-planted inter-rows. If a species was recorded in the plot but did not intercept the dowel on any transect it was assigned 0.5 points. This method provided a measure of relative abundance (percentage cover) of plant species across the plot. To calculate species richness and cover across different life history and growth forms, species were classified into the following groups: total, native trees, native shrubs, native non – planted shrubs, native grasses, native perennial forbs, native annual forbs, exotic grasses and exotic annual forbs using the Western Australian Herbarium (2017) classification. Woody debris and leaf litter surveys Leaf-litter dry mass was estimated by collecting leaf-litter from five randomly placed 25 cm x 25 cm quadrats along two 50 m transects across each plot. Litter was stored in paper bags for transportation and then oven dried for 36 hours at 60 °C. The dried litter was weighed to 3 decimal points. Cover of fine and coarse woody debris and litter depth was estimated at every meter along two 20 m transects for each plot. Woody debris was classified by diameter. Length, max and min diameter was measured for all logs with a diameter greater than 10 cm. 
Credit
We at TERN acknowledge the Traditional Owners and Custodians throughout Australia, New Zealand and all nations. We honour their profound connections to land, water, biodiversity and culture and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging. 
Purpose
Vegetation recovery in old fields towards mature reference states is often limited by abiotic and biotic thresholds resulting from agricultural land use legacies, as commonly highlighted using state and transition models. Old field restoration may include interventions (e.g. planting of vegetation) to overcome these thresholds and assist transition between states. However, our understanding of the effectiveness of these interventions is limited. Using a point-intercept transect method, we surveyed nine sites, each comprising a triplet of fallow cropland, planted old field and woodland reference plots to reflect states of old field restoration, from the degraded state to the reference state. We compared ground cover attributes, and richness and cover of woody and herbaceous flora species. 
Lineage
Data not provided. 
Method DocumentationData not provided.
Procedure StepsData not provided.
The study was conducted in the northern wheatbelt of south-western Australia (Lat -29.66°, Long 116.18°) a region dominated by agriculture (cropping and grazing).
Temporal Coverage
From 2017-09-01 to 2017-09-30 
Spatial Resolution

Data not provided.

Vertical Extent

Data not provided.

ANZSRC - FOR
Agriculture, land and farm management
Biosecurity science and invasive species ecology
Community ecology (excl. invasive species ecology)
Forest biodiversity
GCMD Sciences
BIOSPHERE - COMMUNITY STRUCTURE
BIOSPHERE - LITTER CHARACTERISTICS
LAND SURFACE - LAND USE/LAND COVER
LAND SURFACE - RECLAMATION/REVEGETATION/RESTORATION
Horizontal Resolution
1 meter - < 30 meters
Parameters
coarse woody debris total length
ground cover
litterfall
species cover
species richness
Temporal Resolution
Daily - < Weekly
Topic
biota
environment
User Defined
carbon planting
Eucalyptus loxophleba
herbaceous flora
land use legacies
old field
restoration
semi-arid
woody vegetation
Author
Parkhurst, Tina
Contact Point
Parkhurst, Tina
Publisher
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Export to DCATExport to BibTeXExport to EndNote/Zotero
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Queensland, 4068, Australia.
Contact Us
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}. 
TERN services are provided on an "as-is" and "as available" basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure.
Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN.

Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting 

Contact us

Physical & Mail Address
The University of Queensland
Long Pocket Precinct
Level 5, Foxtail Building #1019
80 Meiers Road
Indooroopilly QLD 4068 Australia

General enquiries
P: (07) 3365 9097
tern@uq.edu.au

Data Support
esupport@tern.org.au

Subscribe for project updates, data releases, research findings, and users stories direct to your inbox.

Funding

TERN is supported by the Australian Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy, NCRIS.

Co-investment

Accreditation

CoreTrustSeal

Resources

Terms Of Use

Disclaimer

Copyright

Data Licensing

Help & Support

Key Operating Partners
Version:6.2.22