Data Apps
EcoImagesEcoPlots
Tools
CoESRA Virtual DesktopData DiscoveryLandscape Data VisualiserSHaRED Data SubmissionTERN Linked Data ResourcesTERN Account
Resources
Terms Of UseDisclaimerCopyrightData LicensingHelp & Support
logo
Data

Data Discovery

  • Home
  • Search
  • Resources
    LTES SurveyResearch Infrastructure
    TDDP User ManualTDDP API

Soil and Landscape Grid National Soil Attribute Maps - Depth of Regolith (3" resolution) - Release 2 

Ver: 2
Status of Data: completed
Update Frequency: notPlanned
Security Classification: unclassified
Record Last Modified: 2025-12-02
Viewed 342 times
Accessed 97 times
Dataset Created: 2015-06-01
Dataset Published: 2015-07-29
Data can be accessed from the following links:
HTTPPoint-of-truth metadata URLHTTPCloud Optimised GeoTIFFs - Depth of Regolith, Release 2WMSDER_v2HTTPLandscape Data Visualiser - Depth of Regolith, Release 2HTTPro-crate-metadata.jsonHTTPFile Naming Conventions
How to cite this collection:
Wilford, J., Searle, R., Thomas, M. & Grundy, M. (2015). Soil and Landscape Grid National Soil Attribute Maps - Depth of Regolith (3" resolution) - Release 2. Version 2. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. https://dx.doi.org/10.4225/08/55C9472F05295 
This is Version 2 of the Depth of Regolith product of the Soil and Landscape Grid of Australia (produced 2015-06-01).

The Soil and Landscape Grid of Australia has produced a range of digital soil attribute products. The digital soil attribute maps are in raster format at a resolution of 3 arc sec (~90 x 90 m pixels).

  • Attribute Definition: The regolith is the in situ and transported material overlying unweathered bedrock;
  • Units: metres;
  • Spatial prediction method: data mining using piecewise linear regression;
  • Period (temporal coverage; approximately): 1900-2013;
  • Spatial resolution: 3 arc seconds (approx 90 m);
  • Total number of gridded maps for this attribute: 3;
  • Number of pixels with coverage per layer: 2007M (49200 * 40800);
  • Data license : Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY);
  • Variance explained (cross-validation): R^2 = 0.38;
  • Target data standard: GlobalSoilMap specifications;
  • Format: Cloud Optimised GeoTIFF;
 
Credit
We at TERN acknowledge the Traditional Owners and Custodians throughout Australia, New Zealand and all nations. We honour their profound connections to land, water, biodiversity and culture and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging. This work was jointly funded by CSIRO, Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN) and the Australian Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS). 
Purpose
The Soil and Landscape Grid of Australia is a comprehensive fine spatial resolution grid of functional soil attributes and key landscape features across Australia. The landscape attributes are derived from the data collected by the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, whilst the soil attribute surfaces are modelled from existing soils information. These surfaces provide a consistent base upon which a broad range of analyses can be conducted. This provides essential information, not previously available, that is needed for modelling and managing Australian landscapes and ecosystems. 
Lineage
The methodology consisted of the following steps: (i) drillhole data preparation, (ii) compilation and selection of the environmental covariate raster layers and (iii) model implementation and evaluation.

Drillhole data preparation:
Drillhole data was sourced from the National Groundwater Information System (NGIS) database. This spatial database holds nationally consistent information about bores that were drilled as part of the Bore Construction Licensing Framework (http://www.bom.gov.au/water/groundwater/ngis/). The database contains 357,834 bore locations with associated lithology, bore construction and hydrostratigraphy records. This information was loaded into a relational database to facilitate analysis.

Regolith depth extraction:
The first step was to recognise and extract the boundary between the regolith and bedrock within each drillhole record. This was done using a key word look-up table of bedrock or lithology related words from the record descriptions. 1,910 unique descriptors were discovered. Using this list of new standardised terms analysis of the drillholes was conducted, and the depth value associated with the word in the description that was unequivocally pointing to reaching fresh bedrock material was extracted from each record using a tool developed in C# code.

The second step of regolith depth extraction involved removal of drillhole bedrock depth records deemed necessary because of the “noisiness” in depth records resulting from inconsistencies we found in drilling and description standards indentified in the legacy database.

On completion of the filtering and removal of outliers the drillhole database used in the model comprised of 128,033 depth sites.

Selection and preparation of environmental covariates
The environmental correlations style of DSM applies environmental covariate datasets to predict target variables, here regolith depth. Strongly performing environmental covariates operate as proxies for the factors that control regolith formation including climate, relief, parent material organisms and time.

Depth modelling was implemented using the PC-based R-statistical software (R Core Team, 2014), and relied on the R-Cubist package (Kuhn et al. 2013). To generate modelling uncertainty estimates, the following procedures were followed: (i) the random withholding of a subset comprising 20% of the whole depth record dataset for external validation; (ii) Bootstrap sampling 100 times of the remaining dataset to produce repeated model training datasets, each time. The Cubist model was then run repeated times to produce a unique rule set for each of these training sets. Repeated model runs using different training sets, a procedure referred to as bagging or bootstrap aggregating, is a machine learning ensemble procedure designed to improve the stability and accuracy of the model. The Cubist rule sets generated were then evaluated and applied spatially calculating a mean predicted value (i.e. the final map). The 5% and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for each grid cell (pixel) in the prediction dataset by combining the variance from the bootstrapping process and the variance of the model residuals. Version 2 differs from version 1, in that the modelling of depths was performed on the log scale to better conform to assumptions of normality used in calculating the confidence intervals. The method to estimate the confidence intervals was improved to better represent the full range of variability in the modelling process. (Wilford et al, in press) 
Method DocumentationKuhn, M., Weston, S., Keefer, C., Coulter, N., Quinlan, R. (2013). Package ‘Cubist’: rule- and instance-based regression modelling.Wilford, J., & Thomas, M. (2013). Predicting regolith thickness in the complex weathering setting of the central Mt Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Geoderma, 206, 1–13.Team, R. C. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 1(1).
Procedure StepsData not provided.
Australia
Temporal Coverage
From 1900-01-01 to 2013-12-31 
Spatial Resolution

Distance of 90 Meters

Vertical Extent

Data not provided.

ANZSRC - FOR
Soil sciences not elsewhere classified
GCMD Sciences
LAND SURFACE
LAND SURFACE - SOILS
Horizontal Resolution
30 meters - < 100 meters
Parameters
soil depth
Temporal Resolution
Decadal
Topic
environment
geoscientificInformation
User Defined
3-dimensional soil mapping
Continental DSM
Digital Soil Mapping
DSM
Global Soil Map
Raster
SLGA
Soil Maps
Spatial modelling
spatial uncertainty
TERN_Soils
TERN_Soils_DSM
visible-near infrared spectroscopy
Author
Wilford, John
Searle, Ross
Thomas, Mark
Grundy, Mike
Collaborator
Geoscience Australia
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Funder
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Australian Government
Contact Point
Searle, Ross
Publisher
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Export to DCATExport to BibTeXExport to EndNote/Zotero
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Queensland, 4068, Australia.
Contact Us
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
TERN services are provided on an "as-is" and "as available" basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure.
Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN.

Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting 
All Rights (including copyright) CSIRO 2015. 
Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}. 

Contact us

Physical & Mail Address
The University of Queensland
Long Pocket Precinct
Level 5, Foxtail Building #1019
80 Meiers Road
Indooroopilly QLD 4068 Australia

General enquiries
P: (07) 3365 9097
tern@uq.edu.au

Data Support
esupport@tern.org.au

Subscribe for project updates, data releases, research findings, and users stories direct to your inbox.

Funding

TERN is supported by the Australian Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy, NCRIS.

Co-investment

Accreditation

CoreTrustSeal

Resources

Terms Of Use

Disclaimer

Copyright

Data Licensing

Help & Support

Key Operating Partners
Version:6.2.22