Data Apps
EcoImagesEcoPlots
Tools
CoESRA Virtual DesktopData DiscoveryLandscape Data VisualiserSHaRED Data SubmissionTERN Linked Data ResourcesTERN Account
Resources
Terms Of UseDisclaimerCopyrightData LicensingHelp & Support
logo
Data

Data Discovery

  • Home
  • Search
  • Resources
    LTES SurveyResearch Infrastructure
    TDDP User ManualTDDP API

Kangaroo Island Glossy Black-Cockatoo Foraged Sheoak Data, 2023 – 2024 

Ver: 1.0
Status of Data: completed
Update Frequency: notPlanned
Security Classification: unclassified
Record Last Modified: 2025-12-15
Viewed 0 times
Accessed 0 times
Dataset Created: 2023-03-30
Dataset Published: 2025-12-15
Data can be accessed from the following links:
HTTPPoint-of-truth metadata URLHTTPClouts Index of Glossy Black-Cockatoo, Kangaroo Island 2023HTTPClouts Index of Glossy Black-Cockatoo, Kangaroo Island 2024HTTPGlossy Black-Cockatoo Foraging Rates, Kangaroo Island 2023-24HTTPData Dictionary for Glossy Black Cockatoo Survey, Kangaroo Island 2023-2024HTTPro-crate-metadata.json
How to cite this collection:
Mooney, P. (2025). Kangaroo Island Glossy Black-Cockatoo Foraged Sheoak Data, 2023 – 2024. Version 1.0. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. https://dx.doi.org/10.25901/dyp9-jd24 
This study aimed to investigate whether the reduction in food supply following the Kangaroo Island 2019 – 20 Black Summer fires would result in Glossy Black Cockatoos foraging less selectively on Allocasuarina verticillata (drooping Sheoak) food trees within those patches, i.e. at higher foraging rates. We investigated whether foraging intensity (i.e., the proportion of foraged trees relative to total number of examined female trees) in regions on Kangaroo Island impacted by the fires differed from that in unburnt areas, and whether that had resulted in GBCs feeding on cones with lower food profitability in burnt regions. 
Credit
We at TERN acknowledge the Traditional Owners and Custodians throughout Australia, New Zealand and all nations. We honour their profound connections to land, water, biodiversity and culture and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging. 
Purpose
Data not provided. 
Lineage
Sampling methods We estimated foraging intensity per patch at a total of 54 remnant and revegetated A. verticillata feeding habitat sites over three time periods in 2023-24, comparing sites in regions with greater than 50% and less than 50% fire affected habitat. We also collected cones from 391 foraged trees at 39 of these sites to determine Clout’s Index, a measure of food profitability, and modelled the results for a range of environmental variables. Sample site characteristics are summarised in Table 1(a) and 1(b). Table 1(a). Sample sites, Foraging intensity: 54 sites in total, some sites repeat surveyed
Time period Remnant sites Revegetation sites Ratio of sites in > 50% to <50% burnt regions Mean number and range of trees surveyed
2023 breeding season 12 12 15:9 61 (44-78)
2023 post-breeding 16 10 14:12 43 (16-97)
2024 breeding season 14 25 24:15 59 (23-99)
Table 1(b). Sample sites, Clout’s Index of foraged trees: 39 sites in total
Year Remnant sites Revegetation sites Ratio of trees in > 50% to <50% burnt regions No. sampled trees (sites)
2023 12 12 175:65 240 (24 sites)
2024 2 13 91:49 140 (15 sites)
2023-24 combined 14 25 266:114 380 (39 sites)
Foraging intensity surveys were carried out once during the 2023 and 2024 nesting seasons (February-June), and once in 2023 post-breeding period (September-November), when Glossy Black Cockatoos had grouped together in flock regions. Habitat searches were undertaken at the beginning of the study to locate foraging sites within known feeding habitat patches. Transect surveys were conducted within the habitat patches, both at sites where cones were being collected for Clout’s Index analysis and at additional sites where foraging sign had been observed. We aimed to maximise the area surveyed, with starting points located where feeding sign was first encountered in the habitat. Female trees were categorised as either ‘foraged’ if chewings were present under the tree or ‘not foraged’ if no chewings were present. Chewings weather and change colour with age, with three age groups recorded: up to a few weeks old (cream to bright orange, 32%), darker to faded orange (65%), indicating feeding within the last few months, and older pale brown chewings (3%). Foraging intensity for each site was calculated as the proportion of foraged trees relative to the total number of female trees in the transect. Two slightly different methods were employed, both variations of walking transects (Pepper 1997). Both methods aimed to record the feeding status for a minimum of n=50 female trees, although this was not possible in some small revegetation sites. Dead trees or trees with less than 75% healthy foliage were not sampled. For surveys conducted during the 2023 Glossy Black Cockatoo breeding season, every live female tree encountered with more than 20 russet cones was noted and its feeding status recorded. In the subsequent two sampling periods, transects aimed to cover most or all of a habitat patch so that a representative sample could be obtained. These transects tended to be longer than those in the first period. At each Clout’s Index sample site, we aimed to locate a minimum of ten A. verticillata trees that were at least five metres apart and had evidence of recent foraging. We recorded tree height and estimated the number of russet cones available in two categories (<500 and >500). We collected 10 russet cones from each sample tree, aiming to sample at least three different parts of the tree. Fewer than 10 cones were collected from six trees due to lack of availability. The cones from each sample tree were placed in a labelled paper bag and stored on drying racks or in open baskets until dry (up to 3 months). Each year’s batch was fan dried in a bulk drying kiln for 44 hours at 60 degrees. Cones were warmed in a domestic oven prior to weighing, to assist in removing any moisture that may have accumulated since kiln drying and then allowed to equilibrate to room temperature for at least one hour. The cones and seeds were weighed separately to the nearest hundredth of a gram, using a digital balance. Clout’s index was obtained for each sample tree by dividing the seed weight by the seed-plus-cone weight, based on the method used by Clout (1989) and Crowley and Garnett (2001). 
Method DocumentationData not provided.
Procedure StepsData not provided.
Kangaroo Island
Temporal Coverage
From 2023-03-30 to 2024-05-20 
Spatial Resolution

Data not provided.

Vertical Extent

Data not provided.

Australian Faunal Directory
Calyptorhynchus_(Calyptorhynchus)_lathami_halmaturinus
ANZSRC - FOR
Terrestrial ecology
GCMD Sciences
BIOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION - BIRDS
BIOSPHERE - USE/FEEDING HABITATS
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORIES - WILDFIRES
Horizontal Resolution
1 meter - < 30 meters
Parameters
animal age
clout's index
fire event notes
foraging intensity
rainfall amount
substratum type
vegetation type
Temporal Resolution
one off
Topic
environment
Author
Mooney, Patricia Anne
Contact Point
Mooney, Patricia Anne
Publisher
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Supplemental Information
Data not provided. 
Resource Specific Usage
Location coordinates for Glossy Black-Cockatoo observations have been intentionally masked in the published data files in accordance with the South Australian Department for Environment and Water’s policies for managing sensitive and threatened species information. Precise locations are not publicly released to protect the species and its habitat. Researchers requiring access to detailed location data should contact the data providers directly to discuss access options and appropriate data-sharing arrangements. 
Environment Description
Data not provided. 
Export to DCATExport to BibTeXExport to EndNote/Zotero
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Queensland, 4068, Australia.
Contact Us
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Please cite this dataset as {Author} ({PublicationYear}). {Title}. {Version, as appropriate}. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. {Identifier}. 
TERN services are provided on an "as-is" and "as available" basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure.
Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN.

Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting 

Contact us

Physical & Mail Address
The University of Queensland
Long Pocket Precinct
Level 5, Foxtail Building #1019
80 Meiers Road
Indooroopilly QLD 4068 Australia

General enquiries
P: (07) 3365 9097
tern@uq.edu.au

Data Support
esupport@tern.org.au

Subscribe for project updates, data releases, research findings, and users stories direct to your inbox.

Funding

TERN is supported by the Australian Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy, NCRIS.

Co-investment

Accreditation

CoreTrustSeal

Resources

Terms Of Use

Disclaimer

Copyright

Data Licensing

Help & Support

Key Operating Partners
Version:6.2.22