Data Apps
EcoImagesEcoPlots
Tools
CoESRA Virtual DesktopData DiscoveryLandscape Data VisualiserSHaRED Data SubmissionTERN Linked Data ResourcesTERN Account
Resources
Terms Of UseDisclaimerCopyrightData LicensingHelp & Support
logo
Data

Data Discovery

  • Home
  • Search
  • Resources
    LTES SurveyResearch Infrastructure
    TDDP User ManualTDDP API

Woody vegetation cover - Landsat, JRSRP, Australian coverage, 2000-2010 

Ver: 1.0
Status of Data: completed
Update Frequency: notPlanned
Security Classification: unclassified
Record Last Modified: 2025-12-02
Viewed 3008 times
Accessed 484 times
Dataset Created: 2012-03-21
Dataset Published: 2021-10-07
Data can be accessed from the following links:
HTTPPoint-of-truth metadata URLHTTPCloud Optimised GeoTIFFsWMSlandscapes:woody_veg_cover_landsat_2000_2010HTTPLandscape Data VisualiserHTTPro-crate-metadata.json
How to cite this collection:
Gill, T. (2021). Woody vegetation cover - Landsat, JRSRP, Australian coverage, 2000-2010. Version 1.0. Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. Dataset. https://portal.tern.org.au/metadata/e4de7f56-f1a5-418e-9118-3220f6f365f8 
Three maps are available: 1) foliage projective cover, 2) forest extent, attributed with the foliage projective cover and 3) accuracy of the extent maps, which also acts as masks of forest and other wooded lands. Each pixel in map 1 estimates the fraction of the ground covered by green foliage. Each pixel in map 2 shows two pieces of information. The first is a classification of whether the vegetation is forest or not. The pixels classified as forest are attributed with the second piece of information: the foliage projective cover. Each pixel in map 3 is a class that provides information on the classification accuracies of the woody extent. These maps are derived from Landsat. 
Credit
We at TERN acknowledge the Traditional Owners and Custodians throughout Australia, New Zealand and all nations. We honour their profound connections to land, water, biodiversity and culture and pay our respects to their Elders past, present and emerging. This dataset was produced using data sourced from the US Geological Survey. 
Purpose
We realised that there was no easily accessible map of woody-vegetation cover of Australia, produced consistently across the continent, for land managers and ecologists to use at a local-scale. Researchers and governments have opened access to their field, airborne and satellite image data, making the task of creating such a map possible. We built on these efforts to create a map of woody-vegetation cover of Australia for the decade from 2000 to 2010. 
Lineage
Data produced following the method described in http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1266112 
Method DocumentationData not provided.
Procedure Steps

1. 

Data: The foliage projective cover product is derived from an inter-annual time series of the green layer of the Landsat fractional cover product. The Landsat fractional cover product provides an estimates of the vertically-projected fraction of green vegetation, not-green vegetation and bare ground for each pixel. Landsat 5 TM and Landsat 7 ETM+ images were obtained for 374 world wide reference system 2 (WRS2) scenes covering Australia. One dry-season image per year was acquired between 2000 and 2010 for each scene except those where cloud or wet conditions precluded image acquistion for a year. The imagery were processed to BRDF and topographically adjusted reflectance; fractional cover estimates produced; and masks for cloud, cloud shadow, water, topographic shadow, incidence and exitance angle greater than 80 degrees, and snow created. 

2. 

Statistics: A robust regression of the form Y~b0 + b1*X, where Y is the green fraction and X is time, was fit to the masked time-series of green vegetation fractions. The following statistics were derived from the regression modelling for each pixel: 1) fitted fraction from the model at 30 June 2005. 2) number of observations in the time series 3) minimum green fraction in the time series once outliers are removed, where an outlier is defined as a point whose residual (observed-fitted) is greater than MAD/0.6745 where MAD is the median absolute deviation of observations from the fitted line. 4) a measure of the standard error of the robust regression fit calculated as sqrt( chisqd/(N-2) ) where N is the number of observations in the time series and chisqd is the weighted sum of squares of residuals. 5) a measure of the normalised standard error of the robust regression fit calculated as standard error divided by the minimum. 

3. 

Statistics 2: 6) The slope of the regression line in units of percent green fraction per day. 7) The standard deviation of negative residuals, i.e. those observations below the fitted line. A random forest classifier, using the minimum fraction and standard error was trained on 6597 field or image interpreted observations of woody vegetation presence or absence. The woody foliage projective cover was calculated using P = F - (A*V*tanh(B-F)). F is the robust-regression fitted fraction on 30 June 2005. V is the standard deviation of the negative residuals. A and B were parameters that were optimised and were A=7.93 and B=0.66. 

4. 

foliage projective cover (dma): 0 - null pixels
100-200 - scaled foliage projective cover. To convert to units use: cover_fraction = pixel*0.01 - 1. 

5. 

forest cover (dm7): 0 - null pixels
100 - not forest
110-200 - scaled foliage projective cover. To convert to units use: cover_fraction = pixel*0.01 - 1. 

6. 

Accuracy classes for persistent-green extent (dmb): 0 - null pixels
1 - other wooded lands. That is, classified as woody with a foliage projective cover < 0.1
2 - not woody and a foliage projective cover < 0.1
3 - forest. That is, classified as woody with a foliage projective cover >= 0.1
4 - not woody and fpc >= 0.1. 

7. 

Accuracy: The user's and producer's accuracies, respectively, for each class are: 1 - 72.9% and 79.8% [40.4% and 100% after these pixels were reclassified to not persistent-green because their cover fractions were less than 0.1] 2 - 65.4% and 56.3% 3 - 92.2% and 95.5% 4 - 75.7% and 61.3% 

Australia
Temporal Coverage
From 2000-01-01 to 2010-12-31 
Spatial Resolution

Data not provided.

Vertical Extent

Data not provided.

Data Quality Assessment Scope
The input imagery was processed to level L1T by the USGS. Geodetic accuracy of the product depends on the image quality and the accuracy, number, and distribution of the ground control points. 
Data Quality Report
Data not provided. 
Data Quality Assessment Outcome
The overall classification accuracy of the woody vegetation extent is 81.9%. The user's and producer's accuracy for the woody class were 85.6% and 90.6%, respectively. The user's and producer's accuracies for areas mapped as forest were high at 92.2% and 95.9% respectively. The user's and producer's accuracies for other wooded lands is 75.7% and 61.3%, respectively. Validation of woody foliage projective cover with field-measurements gave a coefficient of determination, R2 of 0.918 and a RMSE of 0.70. 
ANZSRC - FOR
Climate change impacts and adaptation
Environmental management
GCMD Sciences
BIOSPHERE - VEGETATION COVER
LAND SURFACE - LAND USE/LAND COVER
Horizontal Resolution
30 meters - < 100 meters
Instruments
ETM+
TM
Parameters
foliage projective cover
persistent green vegetation fraction
Platforms
LANDSAT-5
LANDSAT-7
Temporal Resolution
Weekly - < Monthly
Topic
environment
imageryBaseMapsEarthCover
Author
Gill, Tony
Contact Point
Gill, Tony
Data Enquiries, Earth Observation and Social Sciences (EOSS)
Publisher
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Gill, T., et al, 2017. A method for mapping Australian woody vegetation cover by linking continental-scale field data and long-term Landsat time series, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 38(3), pp 679-705.
Guerschman, JP., et al, 2015. Assessing the effects of site heterogeneity and soil properties when unmixing photosynthetic vegetation, non-photosynthetic vegetation and bare soil fractions from Landsat and MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment.
Flood, N., Danaher, T., Gill, T., Gillingham, S. 2013. An Operational Scheme for Deriving Standardised Surface Reflectance from Landsat TM/ETM+ and SPOT HRG Imagery for Eastern Australia. Remote Sensing
Zhu, Z. and Woodcock, C.E., 2012. Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 118, 83-94
Export to DCATExport to BibTeXExport to EndNote/Zotero
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
80 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Queensland, 4068, Australia.
Contact Us
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
It is not recommended that these data sets be used at scales more detailed than 1:100,000. 
TERN services are provided on an “as-is” and “as available” basis. Users use any TERN services at their discretion and risk. They will be solely responsible for any damage or loss whatsoever that results from such use including use of any data obtained through TERN and any analysis performed using the TERN infrastructure.
Web links to and from external, third party websites should not be construed as implying any relationships with and/or endorsement of the external site or its content by TERN.

Please advise any work or publications that use this data via the online form at https://www.tern.org.au/research-publications/#reporting 

Contact us

Physical & Mail Address
The University of Queensland
Long Pocket Precinct
Level 5, Foxtail Building #1019
80 Meiers Road
Indooroopilly QLD 4068 Australia

General enquiries
P: (07) 3365 9097
tern@uq.edu.au

Data Support
esupport@tern.org.au

Subscribe for project updates, data releases, research findings, and users stories direct to your inbox.

Funding

TERN is supported by the Australian Government through the National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy, NCRIS.

Co-investment

Accreditation

CoreTrustSeal

Resources

Terms Of Use

Disclaimer

Copyright

Data Licensing

Help & Support

Key Operating Partners
Version:6.2.22